PubVisualPubVisual Book a Demo
Resources Blog About Contact Book a 30-Minute Demo →
Clinical Trial Animation

Clinical trial animation they explore, not just watch.

Every reader opens your readout with a different question. The outcomes physician wants the curve. The community cardiologist wants to know if it holds up in her clinic. A film that answers in one fixed order loses most of them. This one answers each of them first. Try it on the right.

Now playing
Primary endpoint animation
Subgroup efficacy animation
Safety animation
Overall survivalThe headline result, open first for the reader who came for it.

You just did what physicians do. Straight to the part you cared about, skipped the rest. That is the read we build for.

Bringing the trials of teams at AstraZeneca Roche Johnson & Johnson Bristol Myers Squibb Sanofi Regeneron
Why the results slide underperforms

The data is strong. The read-through is weak.

A clinical trial animation that only plays is still a monologue. It answers every reader in the same fixed order, and most of them stop before their answer arrives.

45%

Nearly half of physicians never see it through the channels you have.

82 / 28

percent of pharma teams believe their outreach lands. Twenty-eight percent of physicians agree.

63%

of the time, physicians read only the abstract, not the results underneath.

The read, their order

Physicians open the part of the trial that matters to them.

One approved readout, built so the physician steers the read. The conclusion is the same for everyone. The route there is their own.

1
They start at their questionThe outcomes reader opens the curve. The generalist opens patient fit. No fixed order to sit through.
2
Depth is theirsSome physicians have 30 seconds. Some want every endpoint. The same readout serves both.
3
Safety is never the part nobody reachesIt is one tap away from every point in the story, not buried behind the last table.
The part a fixed playback cannot do

One endpoint curve. Two physicians. Two reads.

The same approved readout lands on two very different desks. Tap a physician and watch the read change. The trialist goes straight to the curve; the community cardiologist reads whether it holds for the older patients in her clinic. One readout, one review.

Your approved endpoint curveOne source. One review. One link.
The trialistHis read of the curve
1
2
3
Same curve, two reads, one review. Both routes recombine parts of the readout that were already approved, so no new claim is created and a single MLR pass covers every path. That is the difference between one film for everyone and a way in for each reader.
FREEThe Impact Gap Report · 2026

The document that settles the "is anyone reading this?" argument.

60+ studies on why physicians stopped reading pharma’s science, and the evidence for what works instead. Sourced, quotable, built for forwarding.

Get it now · free →
PubVisualby RedNovius
THE IMPACT GAP REPORT · 2026
Pharma keeps publishing. Physicians stopped reading.
What 60+ studies say about the gap between published and understood.
What we animate from a trial

Every part of the readout.

Bring the paper, the poster, or the topline. You bring the data and the context. We do the heavy lifting.

Primary endpoint1:48
Primary endpoint

The curve or the number, drawn so the finding reads in a single look.

Subgroups2:06
Subgroup analysis

Who benefits and by how much, kept honest and kept in proportion.

Safety and tolerability1:34
Safety and tolerability

The safety profile shown in sequence, not buried in the last table.

Real-world evidence2:20
Real-world evidence

How the trial finding holds up in everyday practice, kept current.

Your data. Never dramatized.

We do not round up, smooth over, or add a number that was not in the readout. Every frame maps to the trial data you approved, so it is built for MLR from the first frame.

1MLR review covers every version, not per asset.
0new claims. The result is exactly what the trial showed.
30+languages from one approved core.
“They watched the safety section. That never happened with the slides.”
Medical Affairs Lead · Cardiology
See it on your own data

Bring us your readout.

Send the paper, the poster, or the topline. We will show you how physicians would explore it, endpoint by endpoint. On the house. No promises.

Questions

Frequently asked questions

Both. It plays on its own for the reader with 30 seconds, and it opens up for the one who wants every endpoint. With PubVisual Engage on top, interest becomes an approved next step inside the story: ask a question, request the paper, book time.

No. We change the order and pace of the read, never the numbers. Every frame maps to the trial data you approved, which is what keeps it built for MLR.

Yes. A published paper, a congress poster, or a topline readout all work as a starting point. Bring the data and the context; we build the story.

As part of the story, in sequence, not as the slide nobody reaches. The full profile is shown honestly and kept in proportion to the rest of the readout.

We will not tie it to a fixed date. You approve the core the normal way, at script, storyboard, and final animation. From there, that same approved core carries every version, so new cuts and languages do not restart the scientific review. The overall pace tracks your own review, which we plan around with you from day one.

It is built for it. Because every frame traces to an approved data point, the animation is structured for MLR from the first frame and fits your existing Veeva workflow.