PubVisualPubVisual Book a Demo
Resources Blog About Contact Book a 30-Minute Demo →

MOA Animation vs. the MOA Slide Deck

A mechanism slide works with a presenter in the room, and fails the moment she leaves.

The short version
  • A slide deck explaining a mechanism of action was built to be presented. Take the presenter away and it's just static art with arrows on it.
  • A physician opens that same mechanism deck at midnight, on her own. An animation, built to carry its own explanation frame by frame, keeps working there.
  • The slide deck shows a static receptor diagram with a caption. The animation shows the same mechanism unfolding in the order it actually happens.

A mechanism slide works with a presenter in the room, and fails the moment she leaves. Here's what we found, and what it means for how you build your next story.

01Built for two different rooms

A slide deck explaining a mechanism of action was built to be presented. Take the presenter away and the slide is just static art with arrows on it, asking the reader to supply the explanation that used to come from a person.

Same finding, two shapesStatic page
The publication as published
The same finding, designed
One finding

MOA Animation vs. the MOA Slide Deck, told as a story a physician can finish.

The physician readerstill scanning the table…
0:38time to the point
Fig. 01The same approved finding, shown as a static page and as a designed story.

02Where the deck quietly stops working

A physician opens that same mechanism deck at midnight, on her own. An animation, built to carry its own explanation frame by frame, keeps working in exactly those moments.

“Take the presenter away and the slide is just static art with arrows on it.”

03What the comparison actually looks like

The slide deck shows a static receptor diagram with a caption. The animation shows the same mechanism unfolding in the order it actually happens. Nothing about the science changes. What changes is whether an unattended reader can follow it.

04Same source, same review, different format

An animated mechanism explainer is built from the same approved source the slide deck came from, mapped frame by frame so nothing new is introduced. It moves through your existing MLR workflow the same way the deck did.

The Impact Gap ReportFree · request access
Request the report →
Written by
The PubVisual Team
Editorial · PubVisual

We build the science communication our own field teams would want to use, then hand it to yours. This post came out of that same process.

More from the blog →
Proof

See it built around your own publication

Your mechanism deserves a format that still explains itself after the presenter leaves the room.

Questions

Frequently asked questions

A starting point. The animated explainer is built from the same approved source the deck came from, mapped frame by frame so nothing new is introduced.

The moment the presenter leaves the room. A physician opening that deck at midnight, on her own, gets static art with arrows on it. An animation carries its own explanation frame by frame.

No. The animation shows the same mechanism unfolding in the order it actually happens, and it moves through your existing MLR workflow the same way the deck did.